feat: record expenditure_concept in provenance and its JSON schema
Always populated, never implicit, so a downstream artifact says which concept produced it. cog-api passes provenance through verbatim.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
|
||||
"category": { "type": ["string", "array", "null"] },
|
||||
"basis": { "type": ["string", "null"] },
|
||||
"basis_note": { "type": ["string", "null"] },
|
||||
"expenditure_concept": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["direct", "total"],
|
||||
"description": "Which spending concept produced this result. 'direct' is the government's own E/F/G spending; 'total' adds its intergovernmental payments (M to local governments, L to state governments). Only 'direct' is valid for results combined across governments."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"expenditure_concept_note": {
|
||||
"type": ["string", "null"],
|
||||
"description": "How the intergovernmental leg was assembled; null for 'direct'."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"harmonization": { "type": "object" },
|
||||
"recipe": { "type": ["object", "null"] },
|
||||
"suggestions": { "type": "array" },
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user