fix: regenerate the bundled fixture against the sparsified corpus (#18)

The fixture predated three shipped corpus changes at once: no J rows in
summary_categories (it was built before the crosswalk completion), no
representation.parquet or code_set.parquet, and a still-dense wide era.
Every test in this package and in cog-api runs against it, so both suites
were green against a corpus that no longer exists. This is #18's stated
prerequisite; it proves nothing about production until it lands.

Regenerated from the publish tree at pipeline_commit 83f9715 (schema v6,
built 2026-07-29). FY2011 goes from 2,864,212 rows to 496,004 -- 82.7% of
the old partition was explicit zeros -- and the fixture now ships all ten
publish-tree metadata tables rather than six. The generator's file list is
a single constant now, so the copy step and the manifest step cannot drift.

Three test repairs, each a real consequence of sparsification rather than
a number to bump:

  test-categories.R          "assistance" joined the spending subtype
                             vocabulary with the J-prefix codes.

  test-spending.R            The harmonization block counts rows that
                             exist. Broward's E21/F21/G21 were zero-pads
                             and are gone, so the anchor moves to FL state,
                             whose three NA-mapped rows carry $2.83B --
                             the amount accounting was previously asserted
                             only against 0 and could not have caught a
                             bug. Broward keeps a test of its own, now
                             asserting the zero-pads are absent.

  test-expenditure-concept.R Coverage-gap suggestions are presence-based.
                             AL state's only FY2011 B47 cell was an
                             explicit zero, so ig_federal_b47_wide stopped
                             being a candidate there; FL state carries a
                             real amount, so the counterpart guard is
                             exercised against a suggestion that fires.

test-fixture-vintage.R pins the structural facts that separate this vintage
from its predecessor -- the ten metadata tables, the dense/sparse
representation contract, zero explicit zeros in FY2011, code_set coverage,
and J19's category. Checked against the old fixture: FY2011 carried
2,368,208 explicit zeros, so the assertion discriminates rather than
merely passing.

Suites: uscogdata 594 pass / 0 fail / 6 skip (was 576/0/6).
cog-api 357 pass / 0 fail / 8 skip against the regenerated fixture,
unchanged from its baseline.

tests/testthat/test-spending.R

@@ -244,24 +244,42 @@ test_that("basis defaults to 'harmonized' when not passed", {
 test_that("provenance carries basis + harmonization block with na_rows_excluded", {
   skip_if_no_corpus()
   with_fixture_corpus({
-    r <- cog_spending("121011212191", 2011:2012, "Corrections")
+    # FL state government. The harmonization block is scoped by government,
+    # year and flow prefix -- NOT by category -- so a Corrections query still
+    # counts every E/F/G-prefixed row the harmonized basis drops for having
+    # no harmonized_code. The three that apply here are E21/F21/G21
+    # (Education NEC, SB184-186, "discontinued_na", wide-era window ending
+    # FY2011); the other discontinued_na rulings live outside E/F/G.
+    # See docs/phase_r_harmonization_review.md § 1.3/1.4 and cog_pipeline
+    # data/harmonization_map.csv.
+    r <- cog_spending("120000226351", 2011:2012, "Corrections")
     prov <- attr(r, "provenance")
     expect_equal(prov$basis, "harmonized")
     expect_true(prov$harmonization$applied)
-    expect_true(prov$harmonization$na_rows_excluded >= 0L)
-    expect_true(prov$harmonization$na_amount_excluded >= 0)
-    # Data-verified for the v6 fixture (corpus 2026-07-22). The Task 18 map
-    # extension added E/F/G-prefix discontinued_na rulings the earlier pin's
-    # comment predated: E21/F21/G21 (Education NEC local, SB184-186,
-    # "trivial; explicit-NA, full wide-era window"). Broward's 2011 legacy
-    # partition zero-pads exactly those three codes, so this query now
-    # excludes 3 NA-harmonized rows -- all with amt = 0, hence the excluded
-    # AMOUNT stays exactly zero. (The other discontinued_na rulings -- S74,
-    # Z61, X04, X06, the debt-detail family, L24 -- remain outside the
-    # E/F/G/K prefixes.) See docs/phase_r_harmonization_review.md § 1.3/1.4
-    # and cog_pipeline data/harmonization_map.csv E21/F21/G21 rows.
     expect_equal(prov$harmonization$na_rows_excluded, 3L)
-    expect_equal(prov$harmonization$na_amount_excluded, 0)
+    # $2,825,439 thousands of FY2011 E21 + F21 + G21, reported in full USD.
+    # Pinning a non-zero amount is the point: the earlier Broward anchor's
+    # three rows were all explicit zeros, so the AMOUNT accounting was
+    # asserted only against 0 and could not have caught a bug.
+    expect_equal(prov$harmonization$na_amount_excluded, 2825439 * 1000)
+  })
+})
+
+test_that("sparsification removed the wide era's zero-pads from the exclusion count", {
+  skip_if_no_corpus()
+  with_fixture_corpus({
+    # Broward County FY2011 used to carry E21/F21/G21 rows of exactly $0 --
+    # the wide era stored every government x every code, zeros included. The
+    # published corpus no longer does (SB194, cog_pipeline#64), so there is
+    # now nothing for the harmonized basis to exclude. Absence in a
+    # dense_source year means Census published $0; it does not mean the
+    # exclusion machinery stopped working, which the FL state anchor above
+    # proves independently.
+    r <- cog_spending("121011212191", 2011:2012, "Corrections")
+    h <- attr(r, "provenance")$harmonization
+    expect_true(h$applied)
+    expect_equal(h$na_rows_excluded, 0L)
+    expect_equal(h$na_amount_excluded, 0)
   })
 })