Export the coverage-suggestion builder so a caller can compute suggestions without rerunning the verb #75
Open
opened 2026-10-04 08:37:37 -04:00 by jared
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
main
ci/mirror-canonical-tags
chore/release-47-badges-mirror-pr
docs/readme-perf-remeasure-56
feat/pagination-search-balances-57
feat/duckdb-threads-60
feat/cohort-predicates-58
fix/windows-backslash-paths
ci/mirror-to-github
ci/github-actions-matrix
feat/public-release-0.3.0
chore/fixture-sb203
ci/apt-https
fix/pushdown-pagination
feat/all-categories-37
fix/partial-coverage-signposting-9
fix/schema-v7
fix/cog-categories-balance-subtype
feat/cog-balances-25
feat/revenue-concepts-12
feat/expenditure-concepts-11
feat/coverage-disclosure-13
feat/complete-argument-18
fix/kodor-batch-14-15-16
fix/all-scoped-series-breaks-19
fix/regen-fixture-corpus-18
test/walkthrough-findings
feat/expenditure-concept
fix/3-url-trailing-slash
feat/phase-r3-signposting
fix/fixture-option-b-aggregates
feat/phase-r2-harmonization
feat/phase-r1-forward
feat/cog-gov-search-basket-mode
v0.4.0
Labels
Clear labels
kodor
kodor/feature-proposal
kodor/fix
kodor/needs-review
kodor/triaged
madison-walkthrough
severity/high
severity/low
severity/medium
south-guide
verdict/defect
verdict/definitional
kodor
kodor/feature-proposal
kodor/fix
kodor/needs-review
kodor/triaged
Kodor should process this issue
Kodor has written a feature proposal
Kodor should implement a fix (assigned to Kodor)
Kodor's work or failure needs Jared's review
Kodor has already triaged this issue (skip)
Surfaced while building the client-facing Southern API guide
needs
human
Cannot move without a person -- a decision, a check an agent cannot make, something outside the repo
origin
client
Came from a client ask
origin
obligation
Created by a change elsewhere
origin
review
Came from human review
origin
roborev
Promoted from a roborev finding
type
chore
Maintenance with no behaviour change
type
debt
Owed work -- docs, tests, cleanup a change obligated
type
decision
Needs a decision before work can proceed
type
defect
Something is wrong
type
feature
New capability
ws
api
Query verbs and results
ws
corpus
Corpus, mirror, provenance
ws
docs
Vignettes and guides
Assign a task to kodor
Kodor thinks this needs a feature.
Kodor should fix this
Kodor thinks the user is ready to review this.
Kodor is done with this issue.
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Civilytics/uscogdata#75
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
cog_chat now calls the internal
.build_suggestions()directly (cog_chat #67, decision0021), and would rather call an exported function.
Why. cog_chat builds each government's peer comparison with
cog_spending()andcog_revenue()over about 11 governments. Naming the categories, which is the only wayto get the "re-run with recipe = …" suggestions, adds about 0.2 s to every session that
opens a government, and most sessions never ask a peer question. cog_chat now calls both
verbs with no category, filters the rows to its categories, and builds the suggestions
only when the peer tool is first used. Building the suggestions alone takes about
0.15 s for Spokane's cohort; repeating both verbs with categories named takes about
0.55 s.
What it calls today (uscogdata 0.4.0), with the arguments
.verb_spendrev()passes:That is seven internal names, any of which an upgrade can change.
Ask. An exported function that returns the same list the verbs attach as
attr(x, "provenance")$suggestions, for a set of governments, years, categories, aflow and a concept, given the years the caller's rows cover. Something like
cog_suggestions(govid, years, category, flow = c("spending", "revenue"), concept, years_present).The list's order is not stable today (two identical calls returned the same
suggestions in different orders), and a stable order would help a caller that compares
them.
cog_chat's suite checks the internal call against the verbs' own suggestions on every
run, so a change to the builder fails there before it reaches a reader.