expenditure_concept = direct|total in cog_spending(), refused in the cross-government verbs #10

Merged
jared merged 20 commits from feat/expenditure-concept into main 2026-07-27 13:13:02 -04:00
Showing only changes of commit c1c6b5a6ba - Show all commits
+25 -1
View File
@@ -22,6 +22,13 @@
# positives from ordinary reporting variance -- most governments don't use
# every sibling code in a multi-code category every year, and that is not
# a format-boundary gap worth signposting.
#
# C1(a): for expenditure_concept = "total" callers, `result` here must
# already be the Direct-leg subset (the caller filters out
# spend_subtype == "intergovernmental" rows before calling in). A gap year
# is "the requested year has no Direct rows", never "no rows at all" --
# an IG row surviving on a legacy aggregate that Direct excludes must not
# read as coverage and cancel the very suggestion that would recover it.
#' Build the `prov$suggestions` list for a (non-recipe) basis = "harmonized"
#' verb call: recipes whose generic join would fill a real gap in `result`.
@@ -33,7 +40,8 @@
#' @param category `category` argument as passed to the verb (character
#' vector or `NULL`; suggestions are only computed when non-NULL).
#' @param result The verb's already-computed result tibble (post basis
#' query, pre per_capita/adjust_to_year).
#' query, pre per_capita/adjust_to_year), pre-filtered to the Direct leg
#' only when the caller's `expenditure_concept = "total"` (see C1(a)).
#' @param basis The *resolved* basis (`"harmonized"` or `"raw"`).
#' @param flow_prefixes The calling verb's own flow-type prefixes (e.g.
#' `c("E", "F", "G")` for `cog_spending()`, `c("T", "A", "U", "B", "C",
@@ -47,10 +55,26 @@
flow_prefixes) {
if (!identical(basis, "harmonized") || is.null(category)) return(list())
# Exclude any recipe that is ITSELF an intergovernmental (M/L) recipe --
# i.e. every one of its own component codes is M/L-prefixed. Without this,
# a category whose summary_categories rows span both a Direct family
# (e.g. E04/E05, "Corrections") and its M/L counterpart (M04/M05, same
# category since Task 1) makes the M/L recipe itself (e.g.
# `corrections_ig_local_combined`) a raw top-level candidate for a plain
# (Direct) cog_spending() call -- following that hint would silently
# return intergovernmental dollars under `expenditure_concept = "direct"`
# provenance. This is a stronger, unconditional exclusion than the
# flow-prefix gate below/in `.attach_ig_counterparts()`: an M/L recipe
# should never be suggested as a coverage-gap filler for EITHER verb, not
# just kept from being named as the *counterpart* of another suggestion.
candidates <- DBI::dbGetQuery(con, sprintf(
"SELECT DISTINCT recipe_id FROM harmonization_recipes
WHERE component_code IN (
SELECT DISTINCT item_code FROM summary_categories WHERE category IN (%s)
)
AND recipe_id NOT IN (
SELECT DISTINCT recipe_id FROM harmonization_recipes
WHERE LEFT(component_code, 1) IN ('M', 'L')
)",
.sql_lit_chr(category)
))$recipe_id