.build_suggestions()'s candidate query picks recipes by component_code matching the requested category's summary_categories rows, with no flow-prefix filter. Task 1's M04/M05 category rows share the "Corrections" category with the Direct-flavored E04/E05, so corrections_ig_local_combined (entirely M-prefixed) became a raw top-level candidate for a plain (Direct) cog_spending() call. Following that hint would silently return intergovernmental dollars under provenance$expenditure_concept = "direct". Task 6's flow-family gate in .attach_ig_counterparts() already protects the *counterpart* lookup (deciding whether a firing suggestion gets an ig_recipe_id attached) but never touched the candidate list itself. Exclude any recipe with an M/L-prefixed component from candidates unconditionally -- an M/L recipe should never be a coverage-gap filler for either verb, which is a stronger guarantee than the counterpart gate's flow_prefixes check. Confirmed via the full suite: before this fix, a Direct cog_spending() call for category = "Corrections" printed "corrections_ig_local_combined ... re-run with recipe = 'corrections_ig_local_combined'" as its own suggestion; after, it appears only as the "intergovernmental counterpart" annotation on corrections_combined and its capital-outlay siblings. The pre-existing "IG Federal" mis-scoped test (revenue-side B-prefixed recipes) is unaffected -- those aren't M/L, so they remain valid candidates with ig_recipe_id still gated to NULL.
252 lines
13 KiB
R
252 lines
13 KiB
R
# R/suggestions.R
|
|
# Recipe-component-driven signposting: when a basis = "harmonized" query for
|
|
# a category comes back with a coverage gap in some requested years (the
|
|
# result has no rows at all in that year) that a harmonization recipe would
|
|
# actually fill for this government, surface that recipe as a suggestion.
|
|
#
|
|
# This is deliberately keyed off the recipe catalog's component codes, not
|
|
# off harmonization_map rows: no live map row carries a non-blank
|
|
# suggested_recipe_id (the corpus's wide era exposes split families like
|
|
# corrections functions 04+05 ONLY as aggregate rows, which basis =
|
|
# "harmonized" excludes by construction -- there's no NA ruling to hang a
|
|
# suggestion off of, just a leaf-code absence a recipe happens to fill).
|
|
# See docs/phase_r_harmonization_review.md § 0.3.
|
|
#
|
|
# Scope is deliberately narrow: signposting only runs when the caller
|
|
# supplied a `category` (an un-scoped, all-categories query has no single
|
|
# coverage question to answer) and only flags a recipe when the ACTUAL
|
|
# result has zero rows in a requested year AND the candidate recipe's own
|
|
# generic join (same join .run_recipe() uses, including its wide-era
|
|
# aggregate rows) produces at least one row for this government in that
|
|
# year. Checking presence per-government (not corpus-wide) avoids false
|
|
# positives from ordinary reporting variance -- most governments don't use
|
|
# every sibling code in a multi-code category every year, and that is not
|
|
# a format-boundary gap worth signposting.
|
|
#
|
|
# C1(a): for expenditure_concept = "total" callers, `result` here must
|
|
# already be the Direct-leg subset (the caller filters out
|
|
# spend_subtype == "intergovernmental" rows before calling in). A gap year
|
|
# is "the requested year has no Direct rows", never "no rows at all" --
|
|
# an IG row surviving on a legacy aggregate that Direct excludes must not
|
|
# read as coverage and cancel the very suggestion that would recover it.
|
|
|
|
#' Build the `prov$suggestions` list for a (non-recipe) basis = "harmonized"
|
|
#' verb call: recipes whose generic join would fill a real gap in `result`.
|
|
#'
|
|
#' @param con Active DuckDB connection.
|
|
#' @param govid Character vector of canonical_govid values (the verb's raw
|
|
#' `govid`).
|
|
#' @param years Integer vector of requested years.
|
|
#' @param category `category` argument as passed to the verb (character
|
|
#' vector or `NULL`; suggestions are only computed when non-NULL).
|
|
#' @param result The verb's already-computed result tibble (post basis
|
|
#' query, pre per_capita/adjust_to_year), pre-filtered to the Direct leg
|
|
#' only when the caller's `expenditure_concept = "total"` (see C1(a)).
|
|
#' @param basis The *resolved* basis (`"harmonized"` or `"raw"`).
|
|
#' @param flow_prefixes The calling verb's own flow-type prefixes (e.g.
|
|
#' `c("E", "F", "G")` for `cog_spending()`, `c("T", "A", "U", "B", "C",
|
|
#' "D")` for `cog_revenue()` -- see `.verb_spendrev()`). Passed through to
|
|
#' `.attach_ig_counterparts()` to keep the intergovernmental-counterpart
|
|
#' lookup scoped to the calling verb's own flow family.
|
|
#' @return List of `list(recipe_id, label, available_years, hint,
|
|
#' ig_recipe_id)`, possibly empty.
|
|
#' @noRd
|
|
.build_suggestions <- function(con, govid, years, category, result, basis,
|
|
flow_prefixes) {
|
|
if (!identical(basis, "harmonized") || is.null(category)) return(list())
|
|
|
|
# Exclude any recipe that is ITSELF an intergovernmental (M/L) recipe --
|
|
# i.e. every one of its own component codes is M/L-prefixed. Without this,
|
|
# a category whose summary_categories rows span both a Direct family
|
|
# (e.g. E04/E05, "Corrections") and its M/L counterpart (M04/M05, same
|
|
# category since Task 1) makes the M/L recipe itself (e.g.
|
|
# `corrections_ig_local_combined`) a raw top-level candidate for a plain
|
|
# (Direct) cog_spending() call -- following that hint would silently
|
|
# return intergovernmental dollars under `expenditure_concept = "direct"`
|
|
# provenance. This is a stronger, unconditional exclusion than the
|
|
# flow-prefix gate below/in `.attach_ig_counterparts()`: an M/L recipe
|
|
# should never be suggested as a coverage-gap filler for EITHER verb, not
|
|
# just kept from being named as the *counterpart* of another suggestion.
|
|
candidates <- DBI::dbGetQuery(con, sprintf(
|
|
"SELECT DISTINCT recipe_id FROM harmonization_recipes
|
|
WHERE component_code IN (
|
|
SELECT DISTINCT item_code FROM summary_categories WHERE category IN (%s)
|
|
)
|
|
AND recipe_id NOT IN (
|
|
SELECT DISTINCT recipe_id FROM harmonization_recipes
|
|
WHERE LEFT(component_code, 1) IN ('M', 'L')
|
|
)",
|
|
.sql_lit_chr(category)
|
|
))$recipe_id
|
|
if (length(candidates) == 0L) return(list())
|
|
|
|
result_years <- if (is.null(result) || nrow(result) == 0L) {
|
|
integer(0)
|
|
} else {
|
|
unique(as.integer(result$year))
|
|
}
|
|
gap_years <- setdiff(as.integer(years), result_years)
|
|
if (length(gap_years) == 0L) return(list())
|
|
|
|
meta <- tibble::as_tibble(DBI::dbGetQuery(con, sprintf(
|
|
"SELECT recipe_id, any_value(label) AS label,
|
|
MIN(year_min) AS year_min, MAX(year_max) AS year_max
|
|
FROM harmonization_recipes
|
|
WHERE recipe_id IN (%s)
|
|
GROUP BY recipe_id",
|
|
.sql_lit_chr(candidates)
|
|
)))
|
|
|
|
# Which (recipe_id, year) pairs the recipe's own generic join actually
|
|
# covers for this government, restricted to the gap years -- the same
|
|
# join .run_recipe() uses (component year_min/year_max + gov_type_scope,
|
|
# no is_aggregate filter), just checking existence instead of summing.
|
|
covered <- DBI::dbGetQuery(con, sprintf(
|
|
"SELECT DISTINCT r.recipe_id, l.year
|
|
FROM long l
|
|
JOIN harmonization_recipes r
|
|
ON l.item_code = r.component_code
|
|
AND l.year BETWEEN r.year_min AND r.year_max
|
|
AND (r.gov_type_scope = 'all'
|
|
OR (r.gov_type_scope = 'state' AND l.type = 0)
|
|
OR (r.gov_type_scope = 'local' AND l.type BETWEEN 1 AND 3))
|
|
WHERE r.recipe_id IN (%s)
|
|
AND l.canonical_govid IN (%s)
|
|
AND l.year IN (%s)",
|
|
.sql_lit_chr(candidates), .sql_lit_chr(govid),
|
|
paste(gap_years, collapse = ",")
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
suggestions <- list()
|
|
for (rid in candidates) {
|
|
if (!rid %in% covered$recipe_id) next
|
|
m <- meta[meta$recipe_id == rid, ]
|
|
suggestions[[length(suggestions) + 1L]] <- list(
|
|
recipe_id = rid,
|
|
label = m$label[[1]],
|
|
available_years = c(as.integer(m$year_min), as.integer(m$year_max)),
|
|
hint = sprintf("re-run with recipe = '%s'", rid)
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
.attach_ig_counterparts(con, suggestions, flow_prefixes)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#' Attach `ig_recipe_id` to each suggestion: the intergovernmental-expenditure
|
|
#' recipe (an M-to-local or L-to-state recipe) whose component codes cover
|
|
#' exactly the same set of function suffixes as the firing recipe's own
|
|
#' components, e.g. `corrections_combined`'s {E04, E05} -> suffixes {"04",
|
|
#' "05"} matches `corrections_ig_local_combined`'s {M04, M05} -> the same
|
|
#' {"04", "05"}. `NULL` when no such recipe exists, which also covers the
|
|
#' case where the firing recipe already IS the IG recipe (self-matches are
|
|
#' excluded, so an IG recipe never names itself as its own counterpart).
|
|
#'
|
|
#' Matching is deliberately an exact set match, not "any suffix in common":
|
|
#' the two-digit suffix only means the same "function" across recipes that
|
|
#' share the underlying Census functional-classification scheme (E/F/G/L/M
|
|
#' all use "04"/"05" for corrections). M/L "combined other" codes (47/89/
|
|
#' 91-94) reuse digits for an unrelated catch-all construct, so e.g.
|
|
#' `general_gov_e89_wide`'s {E85, E89} -> {"85", "89"} must NOT match
|
|
#' `ige_local_m89_wide`'s {"89", "91", "92", "93"} on the shared "89" alone.
|
|
#' Checked by hand against the full harmonization_recipes catalog: only the
|
|
#' corrections family (E/F/G/M, suffixes 04/05) has an exact-set match in
|
|
#' this corpus.
|
|
#'
|
|
#' Exact-set suffix matching is NOT enough on its own, though: the same
|
|
#' reused-digit problem exists ACROSS the revenue-side IG families too.
|
|
#' `ig_local_d47_wide` (D47/D94, suffixes {"47","94"}) is an exact-set match
|
|
#' for `ige_local_m47_wide` (M47/M94, same suffixes) even though one is
|
|
#' intergovernmental REVENUE received from local governments and the other is
|
|
#' intergovernmental EXPENDITURE paid to local governments -- unrelated flows
|
|
#' that happen to reuse "47"/"94" for their own "transit/utilities" and
|
|
#' "other/combined" catch-alls. `ig_federal_b47_wide`, `ig_state_c47_wide`,
|
|
#' and their `*_89` siblings all collide the same way. None of this is
|
|
#' reachable via `cog_revenue()` in the bundled fixture today (its B/C/D
|
|
#' recipes never happen to have a covered gap year for any fixture govid),
|
|
#' but it IS reachable via a mis-scoped `cog_spending()` call on a
|
|
#' revenue-only category, e.g. `cog_spending(gov, category = "IG Federal")`
|
|
#' fires `ig_federal_b47_wide`/`ig_federal_b89_wide` for real in the fixture
|
|
#' -- so this is a live, not merely theoretical, gap.
|
|
#'
|
|
#' Two flow-family checks close this, both required (see
|
|
#' `tests/testthat/test-expenditure-concept.R`, "revenue-flavored ... never
|
|
#' receives an M/L counterpart" tests, for the pairwise verification):
|
|
#' 1. `own_prefix %in% flow_prefixes`: the firing recipe's own component
|
|
#' codes must belong to the calling verb's own flow family (the same
|
|
#' `flow_prefixes` `.build_harmonization_block()` uses, see
|
|
#' `R/basis.R`). This blocks a recipe surfaced through a mis-scoped
|
|
#' category from ever reaching the M/L search, e.g. `cog_spending()`'s
|
|
#' flow_prefixes are `c("E","F","G")`, which `ig_federal_b47_wide`'s own
|
|
#' `"B"` is not part of.
|
|
#' 2. `own_prefix %in% c("E","F","G")`: M/L only ever pairs with the
|
|
#' DIRECT-expenditure family, never with revenue (`cog_revenue()`'s
|
|
#' flow_prefixes already fold B/C/D in as ordinary revenue -- there is
|
|
#' no separate "Total" bolt-on for revenue the way `expenditure_concept`
|
|
#' adds one for spending) and never with ANOTHER M/L recipe (without
|
|
#' this check, `ige_local_m47_wide` would wrongly match sibling
|
|
#' `ige_state_l47_wide` on their shared {"47","94"} suffix set).
|
|
#' Condition 1 alone does not catch this: under `cog_revenue()`,
|
|
#' `ig_federal_b47_wide`'s own `"B"` IS inside revenue's own
|
|
#' `flow_prefixes`, so only this second, family-specific check blocks
|
|
#' the search.
|
|
#' @noRd
|
|
.attach_ig_counterparts <- function(con, suggestions, flow_prefixes) {
|
|
if (length(suggestions) == 0L) return(suggestions)
|
|
|
|
comp <- DBI::dbGetQuery(con,
|
|
"SELECT recipe_id, component_code FROM harmonization_recipes")
|
|
comp$prefix <- substr(comp$component_code, 1L, 1L)
|
|
comp$suffix <- substr(comp$component_code, 2L, nchar(comp$component_code))
|
|
suffix_sets <- lapply(split(comp$suffix, comp$recipe_id), function(x) sort(unique(x)))
|
|
prefix_sets <- lapply(split(comp$prefix, comp$recipe_id), function(x) sort(unique(x)))
|
|
|
|
ig_recipe_ids <- unique(comp$recipe_id[comp$prefix %in% c("M", "L")])
|
|
|
|
find_counterpart <- function(rid) {
|
|
own_prefix <- prefix_sets[[rid]]
|
|
own_suffix <- suffix_sets[[rid]]
|
|
if (is.null(own_prefix) || is.null(own_suffix)) return(NULL)
|
|
if (!all(own_prefix %in% flow_prefixes)) return(NULL)
|
|
if (!all(own_prefix %in% c("E", "F", "G"))) return(NULL)
|
|
for (cand in ig_recipe_ids) {
|
|
if (identical(cand, rid)) next
|
|
if (setequal(suffix_sets[[cand]], own_suffix)) return(cand)
|
|
}
|
|
NULL
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
lapply(suggestions, function(s) {
|
|
# `s$ig_recipe_id <- NULL` would DELETE the element rather than set it
|
|
# (standard R list-assignment gotcha), leaving no-match entries missing
|
|
# the key entirely instead of carrying it as NULL. Single-bracket
|
|
# assignment with a wrapped list preserves a NULL-valued element so the
|
|
# field is always present, per the brief's "NULL when there is none".
|
|
s["ig_recipe_id"] <- list(find_counterpart(s$recipe_id))
|
|
s
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#' Emit the single cli::cli_inform() message summarizing all suggestions
|
|
#' for a verb call (the brief's "one message", not one per suggestion).
|
|
#' Bullet text is pre-formatted plain text (no cli/glue `{}` markup) since
|
|
#' recipe ids/labels are untrusted-ish data values, not literal call-site
|
|
#' expressions. When a suggestion has an `ig_recipe_id`, one indented
|
|
#' continuation line is appended naming the intergovernmental counterpart
|
|
#' recipe (embedded `\n` renders as a hanging-indent continuation of the
|
|
#' same bullet under cli, not a new bullet).
|
|
#' @noRd
|
|
.inform_suggestions <- function(suggestions) {
|
|
bullets <- vapply(suggestions, function(s) {
|
|
bullet <- sprintf("%s (%d-%d): %s", s$recipe_id,
|
|
s$available_years[1], s$available_years[2], s$hint)
|
|
if (!is.null(s$ig_recipe_id)) {
|
|
bullet <- paste0(bullet, sprintf(
|
|
"\n intergovernmental counterpart: recipe = '%s'", s$ig_recipe_id))
|
|
}
|
|
bullet
|
|
}, character(1))
|
|
cli::cli_inform(c(
|
|
i = "Coverage gap detected for the requested years; a harmonization recipe may fill it:",
|
|
stats::setNames(bullets, rep("*", length(bullets)))
|
|
))
|
|
}
|